THE SUNDERLAND SITE - PAGE 018
WHATEVER HAPPENED TO (OR AT) ......?
To search for specific text on this page, just press 'CTRL + F' & then enter your search term.
The page heading says it all. Just five items today. I am sure that in due course the page will cover many other subjects, but with the ever-expanding content of this page, additional items may need to be rather on a new & additional page.
'Wilson' timber yard, just east of the bridges on the north side
The 'Graham' timber yard, located just east of the Wilson yard.
'Penshaw Monument', Penshaw Hill, between Washington & Houghton-le-Spring.
The 'Havelock House' fire of 1898. The worst fire in the history of the city.
'Joplings', a landmark in Sunderland for over 200 years.
'Hartley's Glass Works', manufacturer of plate & sheet glass for almost 60 years.
Visits of the Fleet to Sunderland over the years.
Over the years, I have seen a number of images, mainly postcard images, of the 'Wilson' timber yard, east of the road bridge on the north bank. Not images of the timber yard per se, but rather images of the bridge which also happen to show the timber yard because it was right next door.
But what happened to it? I learn, thanks to author Keith Cockerill, that a print, published in 1890, tells us, at its bottom, as follows:-
How interesting! And here is the related print kindly provided by Keith Cockerill. From a publication the name of which is today unknown. The exact date of the fire in Mar. 1890 & the cause of the fire remain to be determined.
Note that the article above refers incorrectly to 'J. D. W. Wilson & Sons' when it should correctly refer to 'J. & W. Wilson and Sons'.
It would seem, however, that the timber yard must have been rebuilt after the 1890 fire. And that the business continued in operation for many more years. It would seem until the 1950s. A postcard, posted in 1950, is below. Bianca Heggie has kindly written in to tell us more about the timber yard, as you can read lower on this page - here.
If YOU can tell us more about the timber yard, do please consider doing so.
Another image of the Wilson's Sawmills. Can you tell us its origin?
The timber yard was built by my direct ancestors so I may be able to help provide so more information about it.
'J. & W. Wilson’s Timber Merchants' was set up by my g-g-g grandfather John Wilson (1825/?) who was born in 1825 in Yorkshire. He moved from Hunslet, Leeds, to Sunderland to start the business & was soon joined by his younger brother William. The business was set up at the north end of Wearmouth Bridge in 1851. The business was twice the scene of fires. In Dec. 1878, the timber yard and saw mills were destroyed by fire causing damage estimated at £20,000. And in Mar. 1890 there was another similarly large fire (the details of which you already have on your website).
The business became 'J. & W. Wilson and Sons' as William's son Alfred & Samuel Wilson (1857/1933), John's son & my g-g grandfather, joined the business in 1879. By 1899 the business was run by Samuel Wilson & by William’s sons Tom Cooper & Hugh. By 1899, the business also had premises (I think a sawmill) on Newcastle Road.
Samuel Wilson (at left), married into the Thompson shipbuilder family – marrying Sarah Harriet Johnson Thompson (daughter of John Thompson, one of the sons in Robert Thompson and Sons) in 1881. This connection to the shipbuilders must have been useful for the timber business. Samuel Wilson’s sons Sam and Oswald (top & bottom at right) went into the family business & took control when Samuel Wilson died in 1933.
My knowledge of the business is a little hazy after this – I have a vague recollection (from family discussions) that the business was wound up in the 1950s, but I have no evidence to back this up.
My maternal grandfather, Alexander Logan, served his time at Wilson's sawmill as an apprentice/trainee sawyer. He ended his working life there as a ‘Top Sawyer’ having in the process lost his right index finger to the saw, an all too common injury as push sticks just weren’t used by 'real' sawyers.
The sawmill was still just about running in the very early 1960s. I know that because an old boy of my boarding school in Kent, Charlie Shea, who was for a time editor of the Sunderland Echo, visited the school. Finding out I was a grandson of Alex Logan (a bit of a Wearside character) he sent me a then recent copy of the Echo which featured a photograph of the sawmill taken from the river. One of my uncles was also named Oswald after Oswald Wilson.
Oswald Wilson was my mother's father (my grandfather). He lived just around the corner from the Seaburn Hotel. He and my grandmother, Sarah Sloan, were divorced shortly after WW1. He died in the early 60s and left an inheritance to his grandchildren who were as follows:- Margaret (Lacey) Blanchard, Oswald Lacey, Bryan Lacey (me), Julie Mason, Bob Martin, Anthony Martin, Douglas Martin & a fourth Martin son whose name I can't remember. The Martin's were all from Carsphairn, Scotland, & emigrated to Vancouver Island, Canada, around 1950.
I, Bryan Lacey emigrated to Canada in 1949 then to the U.S.A. in 1955. I now live in Arizona, U.S.A. The timber yard was still in operation in 1949 when I left Sunderland. There was a Wilson lumber yard just up the road from the Wheat Sheaf.
Bryan adds that just above Wilson's Timber Yard at the north end of the Bridge was the Bromarsh Theatre. Bryan's father was Manager of the theatre until the night it was bombed, on May 24, 1943, which was Bryan's 14th birthday. At which time he left school & started working at Joplings Department Store for four years.
There were, I learn, two timber yards on the north bank of the river immediately to the east of the road bridge. A timber yard, owned by Joseph A. (Alexander?) Graham, occupied the site immediately to the east of the 'Wilson' yard (could it be in the image a little higher on this page, above the white text area?). Until, that is, he had to sell up as a result of major business losses. Joseph later died, in or about 1862, at the relatively young age of 54.
We thank Meg Hartford for this information & thank her also for the following two page memoranda, which was written, in Nov. 1913, by George W. Graham (1888/?), Joseph A. Graham's grandson. Meg advises that some modest data in the image that follows has been since found to be inaccurate as a result of additional family research. The 'memoranda' is available in a larger size here.
The memoranda refers to Joseph Graham having supplied timber to Robert Thompson, indeed having 'practicably started him in life'. It would seem that Robert left his established shipbuilding family to set up his first independent shipbuilding business, at Southwick, in 1854.
We thank Bill Greenwell for the following paragraph that relates to Bill's great great grandfather, James Buskin Frail, & to Joseph Graham Frail, his son, likely named after the Joseph Graham who had a timber yard immediately to the east of the Bridge on part of Bonnersfield near the brewery.
In the second half of the nineteenth century, some families were keen on naming their children not only for family but for neighbours and influences. This was the case with my maternal great-great-grandparents, the master mariner James Buskin Frail and Elizabeth Frail, of Monkwearmouth, both of whose fathers had lived in Brewery Bank until their deaths. In 1865, a son was born: they called him Joseph Graham Frail (Mar 1865 10a 541). It seems probable that he was named for the recently deceased Joseph Graham, the Brewery Bank timber merchant & popular Baptist minister & preacher. Unhappily there is no further mention of the child, and he must be presumed to have died in infancy.
Earlier, the composite image of the Penshaw Monument that appears below was provided - incorporated into a history page written by Len Charlton. It seemed to the webmaster, when that page was first created, that there were so many WWW pages available about the Penshaw Monument, & so many images of it available also, that it would be unlikely that the subject would be again covered on site. But we have changed our minds! In response to a message from a site visitor, who advises me that he was born in 1940 and 'was running around the top (of the monument) in 1948, 1949 or 1950'.
Now what is surprising about that? Read on .... But first a brilliant image of the Monument, available in a giant size from Wikipedia Commons.
The Penshaw Monument has been a major attraction in the Sunderland area for over 160 years. Its foundation stone was laid, with much ceremony, on Aug. 28, 1844, over 168 years ago as this page is updated in 2012. 400 Freemasons attended the laying of that ceremonial first stone, along with a crowd of 10,000. A public subscription had raised about £6,000, then a major sum indeed, for its construction. Built by John & Benjamin Green, I read. Now all of the WWW sites that I have visited state that the monument was built in 1844. Which seems unlikely to be true though it may prove to be so. Everyone records that date when its construction was started but nobody says when it was competed. If it ever was. Was it in fact completed? Was it intended to be built as we see it today? i.e. a folly. Without a roof? If so, to the webmaster at least, it seems to be a strange way indeed to honour, as was intended, the history & contributions of John George Lambton, (1792/1840), the first Earl of Durham. 'Lambton' was, in no particular sequence, Member of Parliament, one time Lord Privy Seal, Governor General of the Province of Canada, Grand Master of the Order of Freemasons, landowner, staith & colliery owner, & also 'a good friend to the poor'. But I read that funds ran out, that the roof & a planned splendid interior were never completed. So maybe there never was a completion date? Rather an end of construction date. And accordingly there may have been no well attended ceremony to announce its public opening. Why it isn't even known by its proper name! Which correctly is 'The Earl of Durham's Monument'.
The above fine illustration was published in 'Illustrated London News' in 1844, & later was republished elsewhere. The construction seems unusually well advanced to have been a 'foundation-stone' ceremony. The image is ex 'Pictures in Print' (search the catalogue for 'Penshaw' in Places), & the original print is in the collection of 'Durham County Council, Arts, Libraries and Museums Dept.' ('Durham'). Should 'Pictures in Print' or Durham request that the image be removed from this site, I will of course comply, but truthfully would seek to locate a replacement image from another source to include here - since the image is so fine & appropriate for this page. The print was a wood engraving, of 11 x 16 in. in size, I understand.
Regardless, for a very long time indeed, it has been a prominent landmark, visible for miles around, perched atop its ancient hill, on a site provided for the purpose by The Marquess of Londonderry. (The name seems to originate from the combination of an old British word 'pen' meaning 'hill' and 'shaw' which means 'wooded'). Folks have visited the site, climbed the steep trail to the monument's base, rolled hard boiled eggs down its slopes each Maundy Thursday, conducted ceremonies at the site at the spring & winter solstices, taken photographs of themselves there, taken photographs of it & from it & have picnicked beside it.
On April 5, 1926, Easter Monday of that year, there probably were many people at the site, enjoying themselves. Included was a group of four children. Teenagers all. 15 or so years old. Carefree no doubt, maybe looking for some fun & a little adventure. Anyway they climbed the hill & made their way to a doorway in one of the pillars, a doorway that leads to steps that climb to the parapet atop the monument. That pillar & doorway can be seen at left. Just one pillar has such stairs.
They were not alone. There were 20 or so others up there also, probably admiring the view & waving to their friends & relatives below. Remember that the monument was never completed. Had it been topped with a roof, there surely would not have been a parapet at all. It ran along both long sides, end to end, edged by a protective wall, & at each end, a masonry arch arose with a sloping surface some 8? feet across. To a shallow peak in the centre of the structure. Such structures are called 'pediments'. On those 'pediments' there was no protective wall, no railings or barriers, & no handholds. I presume that crossing over on those 'pediments' was the only way to get to the other side of the monument, to be able to see & enjoy the views in the other direction.
You can see the scene quite perfectly in this most splendid image.
Temperley Arthur Scott, 15 years old, & a friend of his, went around the walkway twice. And they started on a third circuit, watched by Mitchell & Hind, two of their friends, both sitting on the edge of the peak - I presume that that means with their feet dangling over the edge. 'Scott was hurrying to reach his companions, when he stumbled and fell, he rolled over once and then disappeared over the edge of the monument.’ It was 70 ft. or 20 metres to the ground below. He fell onto rocks, I presume, & was killed.
There was an inquest, held on Apl. 26, 1926, & reported in the 'Sunderland Echo'. It was the first such accident in all of the monument's 82 years, the hearing was advised. Deputy Coroner Boulton returned a verdict of Accidental Death, and said:- 'that it was a terrible accident to have occurred and they must have the greatest sympathy with the parents of the boy'. He suggested:- 'that iron railings with spikes should be put up at the sides to prevent people getting round and if that could not be done then he could only suggest that the place be locked up and the public not admitted.’
And the place was locked up. From then to this very day. With some most rare exceptions (see next para). Or was it always so? Which brings us back to our site visitor who states that he was running around the top (of the monument) 'in 1948, 1949 or 1950'.
I have read that Temperley Arthur Scott was from Castle Street in Fatfield. A recent writer (that link seems no longer to work, alas) says that his late father was one of the other boys. And that they all lived in Herrington in a street called Old Rows commonly known as 'auld raws'. One writer says that 'a few of my mates went up (to the parapet) in the late 70's when they were restoring it ... I saw inside the pillar with the staircase and it was just covered in bird ___ (i.e. droppings)'. Another says it is not only locked up but bricked up also. Another suggests the metal door may be a relatively recent addition.
I have spared the reader a full description of the monument, its dimensions, its location etc. There are many sites where such data can easily be found, such as the Wikipedia site available here. But I especially mention two sites. Firstly a fine 'pdf' file, a Fact Sheet (#14) made available by the Local Studies Centre of the Sunderland City Library and Arts Centre, a sheet that few WWW sites seem to have seen or refer to. Available here. It is a fine publication indeed & contains the brilliant image of the parapets atop the monument that I have shown above. And the second is a site which records the circumstances of Temperley A. Scott's death more completely.
There are some nagging questions about the monument - these words are introduced as the result of one such question e-mailed by a site visitor.
i) Is the monument as you see it today complete as it was planned? Fact Sheet (#14) referred to above is clear about the opinion of the Local Studies Centre on the matter - 'About £6,000 was raised by public subscription, which was used to build the Monument. However funding ran out and the roof and interior walls were never added.' A great many think that the opposite is true, i.e. that the monument is in fact complete - in one writer's words 'As far as I am aware the monument was finished'. I am surprised that the detail plans of Newcastle architects John & Benjamin Green are not mentioned re this matter.
ii) Was the roof omitted because the Earl of Durham had raised rents for his estate tenants to help pay to finish the Monument & the tenants had rebelled? Author Dawn Cummings essentially comments that if that were true the Earl of Durham must been a clever fellow indeed. He died in 1840 & the dedication ceremony was four years later in Aug. 1844. He must have most cleverly come back from his grave if he indeed tried to raise the estate rents as is suggested.
iii) A statue of the Earl of Durham, as a rider on horseback, was intended to be on the top of the monument. But that that statue was given instead to Durham. The Durham statue is apparently not of the Earl of Durham, rather of the Marquess of Londonderry. Any statue would surely have destroyed the symmetry of the structure. And the statue is of the wrong person. The story seems unlikely.
iv) The monument is said to be based upon the Temple of Hephaestus in ancient Greece. Or is it the Temple of Diana at Ephesus, Turkey? Did either temple lack a roof? Both temples still stand to this very day, in Athens & at Ephesus. You can see hundreds of images of the temples here & here - they clearly had roofs, indeed the Temple of Hephaestus still does have its roof!
The monument is today owned by the National Trust, a gift of the 5th Earl of Durham in 1939.
It would be good to be able to provide through these pages, the complete texts of the Inquest's decision & of the 'Sunderland Echo' article which reported it. If you have such material, it would be welcomed indeed.
On Aug. 29, 2011, it was possible, for the first time in 85 years, to climb to the top of the Penshaw Monument. That day, between the hours of 10:00 a.m. & 4:00 p.m., at a fee of £5 per person, visitors were taken on guided ascents by staff of The National Trust. In parties of five, leaving every 20 minutes, thru the 6 hour time period. Only 90 visitors in total were able to make the climb, in small parties limited for safety concerns to 5 visitors per party. Now there were many more than 90 who wished to ascend the monument but they were all turned away disappointed, including one person who came especially all the way from Kent & was not able to buy a ticket. But it would seem that the day was a great success & there will be many similar opportunities to ascend the structure in the future. The safety of the climbers was of the greatest importance. of course, & no tiny children were permitted - you needed to be more than a metre tall to be permitted access. A site visitor has kindly provided a newspaper cutting from the Aug. 30, 2011 edition of 'Northern Echo'.
Visitors were only permitted onto the parapet of just one side of the building. So the visitors' views over the countryside were therefore limited in terms of direction. Getting to the 'other side' used to require a scramble over the arches at either end of the structure - see the image immediately above. I learn however that wires are now installed (a ManSafe System) that permit maintenance workers to attach themselves & cross over safely to the other side. I learn also that there was an unusual eBay item offered by National Trust in Nov. 2011, the opportunity for a single adventurous soul to visit both sides of the monument & cross over both ends. Attached to the wires. At a mid-week future date to be mutually agreed. As you can read here. The winning bid was £122, I see.
The weather was fine & the view was splendid. To prove it, here is site contributor Keith Cockerill atop the monument on Aug. 29, 2011. He cleverly managed to get a fine picture taken of himself with not another visitor in sight. Very sneaky! You can see the image in a wider view here. And do not miss Keith's slideshow 'The River Wear at Washington - its forgotten history' here.
Alan Vickers kindly advises me that the Penshaw Monument was featured in 'A and P News', the employee magazine of Austin & Pickersgill Limited. Two pages were published in Volume 22, of Oct. 1978 & one of those pages contains a fine image of John George Lambton. I provide next thumbnail images of the two pages. The pages can be viewed in a fully legible size by clicking on the thumbnails. Alan also advises that a booklet was published in 1978 entitled 'Penshaw Monument - Erected in Memory of the First Earl of Durham, John George Lambton 1792-1840'. It was written by Albert L. Hind & is of 24 pages - privately published I do believe. I understand, however, that the booklet almost entirely relates to the life of the Earl of Durham & that its content about the monument itself is modest.
Now I did try to track down Albert L. Hind to check his memory of historical details re this section. But I have now found references to the fact that Albert Hind, who used to live in Fatfield, died some years ago, that his house was razed (maybe it burned also) & that his daughter lives in a house on the site today. Should that daughter, who likely owns the booklet's copyright, wish to consider such a matter, I would gladly create space on this site to present Albert's 24 page 'Penshaw' booklet so it could be read, cover to cover, by all who have an interest in the Earl. A way perhaps to acknowledge & honour his memory & contribution to local history. The booklet would have to be at hand to do that, of course, but that is surely possible.
You will be delighted, I am sure, to read the following little article about Penshaw. Which article was published in 'Son of Coaldust', a booklet of about 60 pages, by 'Stephenson'. The booklet is undated & contains no data whatsoever about 'Stephenson'. The booklet, however, was surely published, in the 1980s, by Rev. John Stephenson, former Rector of All Saints', Eppleton. He retired, in 1996, I read, and in 2010 was living in East Herrington. The church was clearly his destiny, his purpose in life & his joy. In 1991, he was described, by the Northern Echo, as the North-East's best known priest. 'A pacifist, a poet, a campaigner for social justice, a friend to the miners and an inveterate opponent of the first Gulf War.' And a prolific writer & communicator.
Can anybody put the webmaster in touch with the Reverend John Stephenson today? Or alternatively I invite him to contact the webmaster. Re matters of copyright.
The 'tongue-in-cheek' title for the section in which the following article appears is 'North East Headlines'. A similar section in another of his booklets is entitled 'Believe it or Not!'. Can anybody tell me where the coaldust mines that are referred to are today located!
PENSHAW MONUMENT: It has now been confirmed that Penshaw Monument, the famous East Durham landmark built in the style of a Greek temple in the mid-19th century, is to be sold to Aristobulus Onassis, boss of the multi-million-pound Athenian Monastic Enterprises Ltd. for a sum of two million pounds. The monument will be shipped stone by stone, after dismantling, from Sunderland to Athens, and re-assembled on the site of the ruined Temple of Theseus which was built in 560 B.C. and which fell into decay because of the high percentage of sodium chloride (salt) in the atmosphere of the Greek mainland port. A spokesman for Monastic Enterprises said that the decision to purchase Penshaw Monument had been taken after a team of experts from Athens University had examined the monument & had found that the dimensions of the building exactly matched those of the former Temple of Theseus, and that the stones had been miraculously preserved by coaldust from the nearby pits. "When we have erected the monument in Athens", he said, "we will import large quantities of coaldust and regularly spray it on the stone to ensure that the building will stand for at least 500 years". It is anticipated that the pits closed by Mr. MacGregor on the East Durham coalfield during & after the 1984-85 pit strike will be re-opened for the mining of coaldust, leading to the creation of at least 450 new jobs and allaying the fears of local residents that the pits might be used for the storing of radio-active nuclear waste.
Next, another fun item. A fun image of 'Penshaw'! Of trampolinist Katherine 'Kat' Driscoll, a 25 year old, of West Rainton, (between Durham & Houghton-le-Spring), who hopes to represent Britain in the 2012 Olympic Games to be held in London. Go for it, Kat! As this page was updated in early Jul. 2012, the Olympic Games were just weeks away. I am delighted to tell you that on Jun. 3, 2012, Kat won the right to represent Great Britain in the Games, at trials held at the North West Gala in Liverpool.
The Women's Trampoline Olympic event took place at the London Olympics on Aug. 4, 2012. Katherine Driscoll ended up in 9th place amongst the 16 athletes who competed in the qualification round - and did not advance to the finals. Wenna He & Shanshan Huang, both of China, placed first & second respectively in that qualification round. But neither won gold in the finals, held about an hour later. Rosannagh Maclennan of Canada, 4th in the qualification round, beat out both of the Chinese girls & won gold - Canada's first gold medal of the 2012 Summer Games. We congratulate Rosannagh Maclennan for her 'come-from-behind' success. And we congratulate also Katherine Driscoll & the other athletes who earned the right to represent their respective countries on the world stage.
A bit of a change of subject. Penshaw? I read that there were 2 pubs at Penshaw in 1890 - the 'Bird in the Bush' at Penshaw Staithes. And the 'Bird in the Hand', at Penshaw itself. (There is an image at that link with Penshaw Monument in the distance.) The following most interesting image, provided by 'Billy Fish' of Midfield, relates to one or the other of those pubs it would appear. When the pub was 'a temperance bar'. I trust that inclusion of the (darkened) image here is in order.
This page entry came about thanks to the kindness of Craig Hamilton, of Ballarat, Australia. Who listed a card for sale via eBay which closed on Apl. 19, 2010. Craig's e-Bay store is here. Craig kindly provided the image to the webmaster for inclusion here. A most interesting card, which follows:-
Late on Jul. 18, 1898, a Saturday, fire broke out at 'Havelock House', the name by which George H. (Henry) Havelock's (that's George Havelock at left below) drapery store in Sunderland, was known. A noted store indeed, located at the major business intersection known as MacKie's Corners - where Fawcett & Bridge Streets cross High Street.
The fire may well have been caused by the simplest of matters - a cigarette end, carelessly probably nonchalantly dropped down a grating at street level. Below ground, in the 'well' if you will, the stub is believed to have fallen amongst other debris - paper included - & smouldered & ignited - & the fire was under way.
And this was not just any fire. It was the worst fire in the history of the City of Sunderland. It devastated a truly vast section of the city centre.
Thousands of citizens, & visitors who flocked to the City, thronged the streets to gawk at the conflagration & the ongoing fire-fighting activities. It was not hours but rather weeks before the fire was finally extinguished. Not before it had destroyed business after business in the area - I have read '12 business premises in High Street West, 11 premises in Fawcett Street, 22 shops, offices & a Weslyan Chapel in John Street, & 3 shops in Bridge Street.' A very long list of businesses (& residences also above those premises), went up in flames or were extensively damaged. You can read the long list of premises affected via the first link below.
The main cause of the great extent of the disaster was the fire-fighting facilities of the City at the time. Perhaps I should rather state the lack of such facilities. Fire engines existed in 1893, i.e. steam driven engines that could pump water from hydrants or the river & play it at force upon burning premises. But Sunderland did not have any such engines. Its Fire Brigade was clearly ill-equipped for such a gigantic task. The City had 'barrows', it is true, i.e. carts that were used to carry hoses & other firefighting apparatus to the scene of a fire. And apparently lots of fire hose full of punctures, which hose would be hooked up to the available hydrants. The firemen & the policemen did valiant duty over many days. Also, when the tide was in, Fire Queen, the 2nd steam fire-float of the name owned by the River Wear Commissioners, did valiant service also, only then able to successfully pump sea-water at pressure to the distance & to the height that was required.
The value of the damages was said to have been £400,000, an astounding value in those days. A tiny contemporary 'New York Times' article equated it then to U.S. $2,000,000. What a giant sum! And how the currency values (GBP v US$) have changed in the interval! It was damage from which the businesses & the City recovered only over the succeeding years.
It would seem that, on the opposite corner from Havelock House, the store of 'Drury & Son' haberdashers, but previously that of 'MacKie' a silk top hat maker, was badly damaged but was not totally destroyed. Buildings far away in the City, however, were damaged by sparks & flying embers.
The authority of the whole subject is James T. Bryce. Whose web page (here) covers the subject more completely than I can possibly do so in these short pages & lists the many stores that were affected. He has written, indeed, a book on the subject, entitled 'Sunderland Fire Brigade'. The book includes, I believe, extensive coverage of the 1898 fire. The next image, indeed, is from imagery kindly provided by Jim - a composite image which shows, at left, the remains of Havelock House after the fire was extinguished, & at right an animated scene, near to 'Havelock House'. I do not think that I personally, could ever have climbed such amazingly long ladders, especially when dressed in protective gear & dragging a heavy hose. Purposeful fellows those firefighters must have been! A 2007 'Sarah Stoner' Sunderland Echo article is most worthy of your attention also.
'Sunderland Fire Brigade', the book, is available from Jim as per the bottom of this page.
A portion of a splendid image of the site thanks to Sunderland City Library's Local Study Centre. Do click the image below for the full image.
Havelock House? It was rebuilt over the next 18 months & emerged as a prestigious department store, advertised as 'the largest in Northern England', though in the image which next is featured, the store claims to be 'The Largest Drapery Establishment in the County of Durham'.
A long term friend & supporter of the site, who prefers not to be either identified or even thanked, (but we thank him regardless), has provided to the webmaster images from a 'Havelock House' booklet. A 'Reorganisation Souvenir' booklet that would seem to have been published when the new & rebuilt store was opened in 1900. Or was it 1901? A booklet of 32 pages. All of those pages can be viewed lower on this page, specifically here. Its very first page is next.
But it would seem that the last two paragraphs above are quite wrong! And the booklet must be from a much earlier date than 1900 or 1901. Why do I say that? Jim Bryce has kindly been in touch to advise as follows:- 'You are not sure of the year that the booklet was produced and assume that it was published after the store was rebuilt. The store was not rebuilt and the Havelock Cinema, which opened in 1915, later occupied the site. There was an earlier store, operated by George Henry Robinson, further down High Street East, but the new store at Havelock House housed the expanding and thriving business'.
It would be good to know when Havelock House did first open.
What later happened to the store? It would seem that it did not survive for many more years. (Wrong see Jim Bryce's words above!)
The 'Provincial Cinematograph Company', of London, acquired the property in 1914, for between £60,000 & £70,000. The 'Havelock', a very high class cinema, opened on the site on Dec. 16, 1915. It became the 'Gaumont' in 1960. And closed in 1963.
A modest shop is at the spot today, I am told, & the name 'Havelock House' is long gone.
Is it possible that you have data & particularly images available about this devastating fire. If so, do consider being in touch with the webmaster, for the inclusion of such material in this page.
In the words of Len Charlton (who witnessed the 1954 'Joplings' fire) ....
'As a youngster I knew of 'Joplings' as one of the largest of Sunderland's big department stores but little of its history - which goes back to 1804 when James Jopling opened a small drapers shop at the bottom of High Street East (image at left next below).
With business expanding, he was joined by Joseph Tuer to form 'Jopling & Tuer'. In 1868, out-growing their premises, the firm moved up to a fine building at 176-177 High Street East, (image at right next below), which over the years became ever more popular.
In 1891, it was bought out by 'Hedley, Swan & Co.', (Robert Hedley & Stephen M. (Moriarty) Swan) who, within a further three years, doubled its size by buying the adjacent property of 173-175 High Street East. In a big publicity campaign in 1900, a café was added to the big building & the very latest, i.e. electric lighting, was installed. It had changed from a drapery store to a department store with over 200 employees.
It even issued its own coinage for customers!
At left (clickable) is a 1 penny coin. There were other denominations also. Certainly a 1/2 penny. A 6 penny coin. & a 1 shilling coin. Including one, at right, for 2 shillings - which coin would buy a 4 course meal, elegantly served in the 'Joplings' restaurant.
The name 'Jopling and Tuer' was so well known that the name was retained so people were still 'going to Joplings'.
In 1921 Joplings moved again, this time 'upmarket' to 126-129 High Street West, where Hedley, Swan & Co. had bought J. T. Calvert & Co. Ltd.'s big store on the corner of Lambton Street. The 4 storey store was then renamed 'Hedley, Swan & Co. known as Joplings'.
(An 1890s poster is at left & an image of the No. 126-129 High Street West store, is below)
These were the great days of the store. It survived the bombs of WW2 & the subsequent depression but ...
... disaster struck on Dec. 14, 1954, when the entire building was destroyed in another of Sunderland's big fires.
On that cold winter night, I happened to be returning home from a late party. Driving towards MacKie's corner at about 1.30 a.m., I was surprised to find the town centre very busy. I parked my old car to join everyone who seemed to be rushing on foot & cycle down High Street West and I discovered that Joplings was in flames. The fire, which had been spotted at 1 a.m., had spread rapidly & though the structure looked undamaged, the red flickers through any windows remaining left no doubt that the fire was already out of control. The firemen had left the inside & were now hastily moving their equipment & their vehicles away from the front of the building. No doubt similar scenes were being repeated both beyond & behind the store which took up a complete block. There was a lot of noise both from the crowd's excitement & from the many pumps & vehicle engines. Within a remarkably short time, all of the windows had gone with flame curving up the front of the building which soon turned into one massive furnace, the glow apparently visible for 20 miles. Periodically, the noise increased as the roof collapsed or masonry fell into the cleared areas with accompanying oohs & aahs from the onlookers. Pumps & hoses were working desperately to try to save adjoining buildings, although I could see little of this. On the opposite side of High Street, Ridings, a large furniture store, had lost its windows while being hosed down & was now in serious danger, the manager having to be woken up at 2 a.m. for the keys to be rushed to the scene. At the height of the conflagration, the heat was forcing onlookers back still more & I could feel a cold wind blowing from behind as the air fed the furnace - which surely, I thought, would be the final page in 'Joplings' history. By 3 a.m. there was little left to burn in the ruined red hot skeleton. For my part I was feeling very tired & saddened indeed, & leaving the scene which was becoming more active as firemen & equipment were repositioned, I made my way home to bed.
The fire brigade at one point being surrounded by fires on both sides of High Street & in adjacent buildings. Business continued in temporary buildings until 1956 when Joplings reopened in a fine new store on John Street.
In a guestbook message you can read here, Jean Elliott tells us that after the fire, Joplings opened a very small temporary store, on John Street.
Fast forward almost 50 years. In 2005, with closure imminent, the store was bought out by 'Owen Owen Ltd.' of Liverpool, but they themselves collapsed 2 years later & the store is now owned by 'Vergo Retail Limited'.
Until recently, walking along John Street, you will find a large busy modern store very different from the small drapers shop which opened in the East End over 200 years ago.
Now, in July 2010, the Joplings story seems to have ended at last. 'Vergo Retail Limited', who rescued the store from bankrupt 'Owen, Owen Ltd.' in 2007, has itself become a casualty of the declining markets. Administrators MCR, called in to try to sell Vergo's 19 shops, did not find a buyer for the old Sunderland store & time has run out. It's very last trading day was June 19, 2010.
To the older people of Sunderland it is a tragedy - but many of the new generation regarded Joplings as outdated in today's world. The store had become an icon loved by long-time customers & run by staff who took personal pride in serving them. But whereas Joplings could claim 50,000 customer accounts in its heyday, at the last count the figure was less than 10,000.
Looking back, Marie Neilson, the operations manager, said 'There's never been a morning I didn't smile (as I walked round), but when I was told we only had four weeks I broke down in front of the staff'.
It is difficult to foresee what will become of the now locked up premises.
Located away from the main shopping centre & with many retail stores struggling to survive, conversion to flats, offices or perhaps to a hotel must be the main options - but a sorry period of dilapidation seems likely. A sad end to a story of over 200 years of service & survival for Sunderland's beloved old store.
Does anybody know what caused the Joplings 1954 fire? Len Charlton advises the webmaster that he recalls no word as to how & why it happened. Was there an inquiry into the fire? If so, surely such a matter would have been addressed. In Oct. 2020, Barry Moon tells me (thanks Barry!) that he read in the 'Sunderland Echo' that the fire was the result of an electrical fault - in the basement where the fire began.
I am advised that a poster that read 'Santa Claus is Here Today', located on the exterior of the building at the corner, was left standing. As you can see in the next pair of images, believed to have been 'Sunderland Echo' images. The poster was completely unscathed, while the rest of the building was devastated. Who says there isn't a Santa Claus!
We hope to add more 'Jopling' related images soon. If you have any 'Jopling' images in your own collections, particularly a good sized image of the 1954 fire, do consider being in touch with the webmaster.
The sources of the 'Jopling' images used above? I will identify them as the sources are located. But ... Should 'Sunderland Antiquarian Society' prefer that I do not use the left black & white image of the fire above, (#10), I will remove it, of course. With regret since good images of the fire are scarce indeed. Such applies also to 'New Writing North' whose colour image at bottom right (#7) was featured in a 'Flickr' Factory Nights archive.
1, 2, 3 (a long gone 'Delcampe' auction item), 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14 & 15, 16, 17.
A few 'Joplings' related images. Hover your mouse over each thumbnail to read the subject matter.
This section starts with very little data about 'Hartley's Glass Works', rather with an image. Kindly provided by Clive Ketley. So this section is initially added as somewhere that I can place that image & add additional material that is later located. What I show below is a portion only of the whole image, with additional contrast added with the help of 'Picasa'.
I read that Wear Glass Works was on Trimdon Street. And that it was in existence from 1837 to 1896 producing patent rolled plate, sheet & stained glass. In 1863 they are said to have produced one third of all of the sheet glass consumed in England. The works covered a large area & employed 700 men. We thank this site, 2nd item, for that interesting data.
With the expanding amount of material on this page about 'Hartley's', it is becoming clear that we need in this space a tidy history of the company - including both its amazing success & its gradual decline. For the webmaster, a project for another day - though if you feel like summarising that history for inclusion here, your effort would be most welcome.
But now ... eBay has provided more about Hartley's in the form of a wonderful print, published originally, it would seem, on Nov. 24, 1877. The print, which is 6 1/4 x 5 1/4 in. in size, was offered by 'periodpaper' of Whitewater, Wisconsin, U.S.A. & it sold on Apl. 12, 2011 for U.S. $40.00. We have chosen not to bother 'periodpaper', a giant dealer indeed, re the use of this 'so appropriate to this page' item on site. But we sincerely thank them & invite site visitors to drop by their e-Bay store, which is here. The above eBay listing did not indicate the name of the 1877 publication. I now see, however, that it was the Nov. 24, 1877 Supplement #99 edition of 'Scientific American', & that the print was accompanied by what looks to be an extensive article that extends over 2 pages. As you can see here & here. The print is also available via this marvellous site.
There is a fine additional image of Hartley's Glass Works available via the 'Pictures in Print' site, most similar to that shown above. Available here. And there is a second image, of the blast furnaces at night, which can be viewed here. But ... it is not absolutely sure that that print was re 'Hartley's'. There were many such blast furnaces throughout the city.
Where exactly was Trimdon Street & therefore the Hartley's plant site? I learn that the plant was located at the NW corner of the intersection of Trimdon Street (a short north-south street) & Keelmen's Lane (an east-west street). Neither are in the city's east end, as I initially assumed when I saw the image which follows, but rather are on the high ground, west of the bridges & behind Hetton Staiths, or where Hetton Staiths used to be. The river is therefore behind you in the birds' eye view above. The splendid image that follows, comes from this site, made available by 'Durham County Council, Arts, Libraries and Museums Dept.', now located, it would seem in the Clayport Library, in Durham City. Its date of creation is not known, but it was published, I read, in 1872. But likely published elsewhere too.
So now if I spot any data about 'Wear Glass Works' in the future, I can add it in here. Or your data can be added also, should you be able to provide any. A history of the company can, I see, be found at this 'National Archives' site.
There have been many fleet visits to Sunderland over the years. Certainly I have seen via eBay images of medals that were struck to commemorate the events. And soon, hopefully, we can include here images of such medals. One such medal is already shown below, the front & back of a medal issued to commemorate the visit of 'Devastation' in 1874. Another copy of a somewhat similar medal can be seen here. Ex a long expired eBay listing. In Oct. 2013, another copy of the medal is available via Delcampe.
But next an interesting little story ex a book entitled 'Wearside Wedges' - written by J. H. Meek & published in 1912. We thank Keith Cockerill for item. Keith advises that the book is full of short humorous stories about Sunderland folk, all written in the vernacular Sunderland dialect - which may be a little difficult to understand.
A 'Wearside Wedge' was a nickname for a Sunderland shipwright or carpenter in the days of wooden ships. The word 'wedge' probably because a significant part of a shipwright's duties was to split timbers.
This tiny section is not yet indexed above, since its content is so very limited. It is added to simply show an eBay item of late Oct. 2012 that caught my eye - a label for a 1954 shipment of kibbled lime that originated from the lime kilns of 'Sir Hedworth Williamson's Lime Works, Ltd.', of Sunderland.
I read that 'kibbled' lime was a course grade with lumps the size of your fist.
The kilns are worthy of coverage in these pages as and when time permits. I quickly read that there were a number of lime kilns located at Fulwell, just north of the Fulwell Mill. The kilns burnt magnesium limestone extracted from the now-landfilled Fulwell Quarry. The quarry & kilns were the property of the Williamson family, possibly from as early as 1714.
Such kilns, which operated for centuries until closure in 1957, were formerly linked by three waggonways to the River Wear. At the North Dock area most probably. But the label at left is, of course, for lime that was rather shipped by railway.
The lime was shipped all over the north east. Remains of two of the kilns still exist.
A most extensive 'pdf' archaeological report re the Fulwell Lime Kilns can be read here.
May I suggest that you navigate the site via the index on page 001.PRIOR PAGE / NEXT PAGE
Thomas M. M. Hemy Data Pages 01, 02 & 03 are now on site. Plus all of the other image pages, accessible though the index on page 05.
To MV Danmark Slider Puzzle page & to the Special Pages Index.
A SITE SEARCH FACILITY
THE GUEST BOOK - GO HERE
The webmaster had assumed that the 'Havelock House' booklet that follows, was published when the new & rebuilt store was opened in 1900/1901. But Jim Bryce tells me that the store never re-opened. So the booklet must date from much earlier. Of 32 pages, all of which are available below for viewing in a larger size with a mouse click.
The images look & indeed are 'repetitive' in both style & content, but each features a department or function of a department store of over a century ago. A store where many functions were performed 'in house', including I read, making furniture for sale on the premises, 'from the rough wood to the finished article'.
The webmaster was particularly pleased to see that it contains an image of George H. (Henry) Havelock, the proprietor. And pleased also, since the webmaster is an accountant, to see the image (at left) of a portion of the accounting department (counting house). Not a computer in sight! Not even a telephone.